law.librarians

Comments

  • iOverlord 10:21 am on March 10, 2008 | # | Reply

    I think most of us would say that you and Steve have pretty much summed it up. This also reminded me of a link to another library story linked to by the other steve (Cohen)

  • jamespmullan 10:58 am on March 10, 2008 | # | Reply

    I’ve blogged about this on the BIALL Blog http://biall.blogspot.com/2008/03/are-law-libraries-becoming-obsolete.html

  • connie 4:58 pm on March 10, 2008 | # | Reply

    Okay, I put my two cents in the Legal Blog Watch post. Couldn’t help responding to the troll, but identified him as such for everyone.

  • nickholmes 8:58 am on March 11, 2008 | # | Reply

    The original article, and indeed, Carolyn Elefant’s piece, refer to the physical library space.

  • Whither the law library? : Binary Law 4:18 pm on March 12, 2008 | # | Reply

    [...] Steve Matthews was first up: “it does bug me that every other department in the law firm can evolve, but when Libraries do, they’re suddenly obsolete”; and the next: “this posting does take a very shallow view of what a ‘law library’ is”. Others in a similar vein made the case for librarianship in comments on the blog post and at law.librarians. [...]

  • connie 9:02 pm on March 12, 2008 | # | Reply

    Great write-up, Nick.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.